Legal Opinion
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. US, BUR. OF INDIAN AFF.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided June 21, 1989No. Civ. 86-3014PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DONALD J. PORTER, Chief Judge.
On April 8,1986, plaintiff Rosebud Sioux Tribe filed this action alleging that defendant United States through the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) breached the trust obligation owed the Tribe. Specifically, the Rosebud Sioux Tribe claims that the BIA failed to adequately supervise economic development on the Rosebud Sioux Indian Reservation. The Tribe seeks monetary damages, declaratory relief, and a writ of mandamus to compel the BIA to issue regulations governing economic development on Indian reservations.
The parties obtained postponements of…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shanti, Inc. v. RenoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Wright v. LangdeauDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2016
- Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1996
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. RhoadesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1990
- New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department v. Laguna Industries, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.