Legal Opinion
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. Babbitt
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 17, 1996No. CIV 95-1042PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KORNMANN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff filed a complaint and motion for injunctive relief on November 17,1995, seek ing a temporary restraining order, a writ of mandamus, and permanent injunctive relief enjoining the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) from enforcing hiring freezes or reduction in force (RIF) notices to employees at the Winnebago, Nebraska, agency and from implementing any new hiring freezes or issuing new RIF notices without engaging in prior meaningful consultation. The Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska (tribe) maintains the BIA was required to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vizenor v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Sidney Coal Co., Inc. v. MassanariDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2002
- Temple v. Cleve Her Many HorsesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2016
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. KempthorneDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2006
- Delcid v. Burger King LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.