Legal Opinion
Wright v. Langdeau
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 25, 2016No. CIV 15-4097PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge
Defendants, two Lower Brule Sioux Tribal Council members (tribal Defendants) and three United States government officials (government Defendants) (all Defendants collectively, “Defendants”), filed motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursuant to Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, Doc. 15 and 18. For' the following reasons, the motions are granted.
BAC…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Foster v. The United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
- Mills v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2023
- Nguyen v. GustafsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- Show Me State Premium Homes, LLC v. McDonnellDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Stanko v. Oglala Sioux TribeDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.