Legal Opinion
Foster v. Crossin
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island
Decided April 6, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
These* bills pray an injunction to restrain the respondents from infringing letters patent, granted to the complainant June 10, 1884, for designs for jewelry pins, and numbered 15,049 and 15,050, respectively. The complainant now moves for a preliminary injunction. The respondents, in the first place, object that the patents are recent, and have not been found by any judicial decree to be valid; and they contend that in such case the court will not look further, but will hold that the complainant must fail for want of a judicial decision establishing the patents, or such a lapse of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. HodgesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1871
- New York Grape Sugar Co. v. American Grape Sugar Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1882
- De Ver Warner v. BassettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1881
- White v. S. Harris & Sons Manufacturing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1880
- Jones v. FieldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1875
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. JumperDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1928
- Societe Anonyme du Filtre Chamberland Systeme Pasteur v. AllenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1897
- Hutto Engineering Co. v. Grinder Sales Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927
- McMaster v. Daugherty Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
- Smith v. Meriden Britannia Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1899