Legal Opinion
Hutto Engineering Co. v. Grinder Sales Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 20, 1927No. 1837PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for a preliminary injunction, enjoining the defendants from (1) infringing the Hutto patent in suit, No. 1,610,681; (2) replacing stones and carriers in Hutto tools, where only the stones are worn out; (3) buying carriers and stones manufactured by plaintiff, refilling them, and selling them to ownérs of plaintiff’s tools; (4) advertising the repair of. tools of plaintiff’s manufacture, without at the same time announcing *986that the defendants are no longer connected with the plaintiff.
The patent in suit relates to a grinding tool, particularly intended…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme PasteurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
- Adam v. FolgerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Boyce v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Fuller v. GilmoreU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- Milwaukee Printing Co. v. StoverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Worth Featherweight Pen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
- Western Electric Co. v. Cinema Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. JumperDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1928
- American Cutting Alloys, Inc. v. Carboloy Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1948
- Doughnut Mach. Corp. v. Demco, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1931