Legal Opinion

White v. S. Harris & Sons Manufacturing Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided July 19, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

Lowell, O. J.

The complainant’s patent, No. 220,126, is recent, and has not been litigated, and the affidavits give us to understand that its validity is seriously contested. This is reason enough for not granting a preliminary injunction.

It is said that the defendants are estopped by having accepted a license from the complainant. .But the only license asked for or taken was to sell certain goods which the defendants had on hand when the patent was obtained, which seems to be rather in the nature of a compromise to save trouble, than deliberate acknowledgment of the validity of the patent.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foster v. CrossinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1885
  2. Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. Newton Rubber WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API