Legal Opinion

Midland Steel Products Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 486

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1991No. 90-476PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

For the following reasons, we hold that a nonparty aider and abettor is bound by a court’s order under Civ.R. 65(D) only if the nonparty has actual notice of the terms of that order. Although the court of appeals erroneously applied a lesser standard in this case, we hold that the evidence of notice was sufficient even under the stricter standard. We also conclude that a sufficient foundation was laid for the admission of the videotapes into evidence. Finally, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the motion for continuance and sentenced two of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. EleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. State v. Pickens (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. TenchOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. BentonOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. State v. FreezeOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. AnglemyerNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API