Legal Opinion
Zins v. Justus
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 11, 1941No. Nos. 32,859, 32,860PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gallagher, Chief Justice.
These are companion cases in which plaintiffs, husband and wife, seek to recover damages arising out of a collision between an automobile owned and operated by the husband, Anton Zins, and one owned and operated by the defendant Elmer H. Justus. Defendant McDonald demurred to the complaint in each case on the ground that it did not state a cause of action. These appeals are from orders sustaining the demurrers. As the cases must stand or fall together, we will confine discussion to the husband’s case.
The allegations of the complaint upon which decision hinges are that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Knowles v. Housing Authority of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Miller v. ChouSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Schultz v. RuizSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- National Housing Agency v. OrtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Gurzo v. GREGORY PARK, ETC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.