Legal Opinion
D.A.B.E., Inc. v. City of Toledo
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 19, 2003No. 3:03CV7637PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This case arises from passage by the City Council of Toledo, Ohio, of “The Clean Indoor Air Ordinance of 2003.” Plaintiffs, owners of restaurants and bars in Toledo, challenge the legality of the ordinance. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
Pending is plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be denied.
Toledo City Council adopted the challenged ordinance on July 8, 2003, and it became effective on August 24, 2003. Ordinance 509-03, codified at Toledo Mun. Code § 1779.01 et seq. The ordinance…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Midwest Retailer Associated, Ltd. v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Taverns for Tots, Inc. v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Taverns for Tots, Inc. v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Goodwin v. Walton County FloridaDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2017
- Daisy Investment Corp. v. City of Seven HillsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.