Legal Opinion
Midwest Retailer Associated, Ltd. v. City of Toledo
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 30, 2008No. 3:08CV00851PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.
In this case, plaintiffs, owners of neighborhood convenience stores (“owners”), and an association to which they belong, the Midwest Retailers Association (MRA), challenge a municipal licensing scheme that aims to regulate their businesses. Defendant City of Toledo (“City”) has distributed license applications to the plaintiffs under newly-enacted Toledo Municipal Ordinance 797-07 (“T.M.0.797-07”). The owners now seek a preliminary injunction (Doc. 7) preventing the City’s enforcement of Ordinance 797-07, which took effect on May 1, 2008. See Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LoganOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Petworth Holdings, LLC v. BowserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Committee to Impose Term Limits on the Ohio Supreme Court & to Preclude Special Legal Status for Members & Employees of the Ohio General Assembly v. Ohio Ballot BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Bently v. PerryDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023
- Carl Adkins v. Benjamin Alexander et al.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.