Otto v. Comm'r Safety

Appellant challenges the denial of his petition for the reinstatement of his driving privileges. Because appellant has not shown that his constitutional rights were violated by the deputy's failure to inform him that he could refuse to perform the field sobriety tests, and because the deputy did not err in expanding his traffic stop of appellant into a driving under the influence investigation or in arresting appellant for driving under the influence, we affirm.

*660FACTS

At 1:20 a.m. on a Saturday in November 2017, a deputy stopped a truck that he had observed drive outside the traffic lane and…