Commonwealth v. Gatto
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kenworthey, J.,
Appellant was convicted of pandering and knowingly accepting bawd money. Act of 1939, June 24, P. L. 872 §§513, 515, 18 PS §§4513, 4515. This appeal brings up for consideration the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the convictions and the correctness of several rulings of the trial judge.
Jennie Celli, alias Mary Brands, has been convicted of like offenses relating to the same bawdy house — 520 Pine Street, Easton, — and her conviction upheld in an opinion reported at 153 Pa. Superior Ct. 88, 33 A. (2d) 97. The commonwealth’s theory was that appellant also had a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. CrittentonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. ApricenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Short v. Allegheny Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Commonwealth v. Elias & JohnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SpalloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- United States v. SorrentinoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. SpalloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. WulpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- United States v. LinnearUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983