Commonwealth v. Spallone
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kenworthey, J.,
Appellant was tried and convicted of knowingly ac cep ting money out of the earnings of Janette Rogers, alias Irene Strove, and Chiquita Gomez, women engaged in prostitution. Act of 1939, June 24, P. L. 872 §515, 18 PS §4515. The appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, raises several procedural questions and complains of the adequacy of the court’s charge to the jury.
The commonwealth sought to prove its case by showing that the women were prostitutes working in a bawdy house at 521 Pine Street, Easton, and that appellant was the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LibonatiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. MarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. DingmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Commonwealth v. TraceySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth v. AnticoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. DeBaldoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Commonwealth v. BELOFFSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Commonwealth v. KinnardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.