Wingerd v. Wingerd
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from the denial of his motion for modification of alimony.
The trial court found the following facts: On October 7, 1980, a judgment for dissolution was rendered whereby the plaintiff was to pay the defendant $175 per week as alimony in addition to a payment of $9000 within ten days of the judgment. On December 9, 1982, the plaintiff filed a motion to modify the alimony order based on a substantial change of circumstances in that his wife, the defendant, had received an inheritance from her father. Her assets had increased by approximately $156,000, while the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tobey v. TobeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Noce v. NoceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Cummock v. CummockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- McCann v. McCannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- LaBow v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Pickman v. PickmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- O'Bymachow v. O'BymachowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Santoro v. SantoroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Demartino v. DemartinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.