Legal Opinion

Dowling v. L. H. Shattuck, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 7, 1941No. 3196PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.

The defendant does not contend that its motions for a nonsuit and for a directed verdict should have been granted because of conclusive evidence of either the plaintiff’s contributory-negligence or of his assumption of the risk. Its sole contention is that the record contains no competent evidence that it was in any way negligent. The validity of this contention depends upon the admissibility of the testimony of two witnesses called by the plaintiff who were permitted by the court, over the defendant’s objection and subject to its exception, to testify as experts. The substance of their…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Frear v. Manchester Traction, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Burke v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  3. Carbone v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  4. Emery v. Tilo Roofing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  5. Howson v. Foster Beef Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Alan Scop, Raphael Bloom, Herbert Stone and Jack RingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. State v. StaplesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. Morris v. CartwrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Alabama Power Company v. ScholzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API