Legal Opinion

Procter & Gamble Co. v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1941No. 28385PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millard, J. —

This action was brought to recover taxes paid under protest on herring oil held in storage January 1, 1939, at the East Waterway dock and warehouse in the city of Seattle. All of plaintiff’s herring oil, which had been shipped from Alaska, was shipped outside of the state of Washington within six months after its arrival in Seattle except a certain quantity which is not involved in this case. The last date on which the last lot of oil was shipped from the warehouse in Seattle, was March 4,1939.

Plaintiff alleged that it was a foreign corporation, which is not disputed, and that it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith Company v. DickinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Lilly-Brackett Co. v. SonnemannWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. HarperWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. J. W. Seavey Hop Corp. v. PollockWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State v. TKWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. T.K.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Portland Ass'n of Credit Men, Inc. v. EarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. International Shoe Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API