Legal Opinion
Velez v. Roche
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 30, 2004No. C-02-0337-EMCPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS MATTER OF LAW OR NEW TRIAL; DENYING REQUEST FOR REMITTITUR (Docket No. 207)
CHEN, Magistrate Judge.
Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions as well as the argument of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant Air Force’s (“AF”) motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) or new trial as well as its request for remittitur.
I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Pauline Velez filed suit against the AF, alleging discrimination on the basis of gender. In her complaint, Dr. Velez…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Schwapp v. Town of AvonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- George McGinest v. Gte Service Corp. Mike BiggsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Kerry Ellison v. Nicholas F. Brady, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Global Horizons, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Optimal Pets, Inc. v. Nutri-Vet, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Hardeman v. Monsanto Co. (In re Roundup Prods. Liab. Litig.)District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- C.B. v. Sonora School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenberg & LauingerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.