Smith v. Haight
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Assumpsit by Frank M. Smith, against Louis P. Haight for use and occupation. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This case is here upon writ of error to the circuit court for the county of Muskegon, wherein *514a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,175 and costs. The case involves some of the facts that were involved in the equity case of Haight v. Smith, 178 Mich. 392 (144 N. W. 830). The instant case is in assumpsit for use and occupation of certain premises bought by the plaintiff from the Ross Manufacturing Company, a Michigan corporation, on January 7, 1911. On the 2d day of February following the said corporation was declared a bankrupt on its own petition. It was at that time a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hogsett v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Dwight v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
- Lockwood v. Thunder Bay River Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Ward v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Haight v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re MacOmb Occupational Health Care, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Vhay v. GiesMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Leighton v. LambertMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Vhay v. GiesMichigan Supreme Court · 1926