Penetone Corp. v. Palchem, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the Penetone Corporation (hereinafter “Penetone”), filed its complaint against the defendants, Palchem, Inc. (hereinafter “Palchem”), Carl J. Paolucci, and the Scott & Fetzer Company, d/b/a Scot Laboratories (hereinafter “Scot”) on November 12, 1985, setting forth nine causes of action. In its complaint, plaintiff alleges, inter alia: (1) that the defendant Paolucci and “his essentially alter ego,” Palchem, have violated a noncompete clause in an employment agreement between defendant Paolucci and the plaintiff; (2) that the defendant Paolucci revealed trade…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Pyromatics, Inc. v. PetruzielloOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Water Management, Inc. v. StayanchiOhio Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kendall Holdings, Ltd. v. Eden Cryogenics LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Winklevoss Consultants, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- ALTA Analytics, Inc. v. MuussDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- Basicomputer Corp. v. ScottDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. YoderDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.