Fitzimons v. Atherton
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County and from an order refusing a new trial. Paul W. Bennett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to quiet title to a tract of land containing 4.44 acres, constituting a part of lot 2 of Kelley’s Addition to the town of Delano, in Kern County. The tract embraces part of the east half and part of the west half of the lot, which, according to the plat and survey thereof, contains ten acres. The defendants answered, admitting the ownership of the west half of lot 2 by the plaintiff, denying his ownership of any part of the east half thereof, and also -alleging that defendant A. C. Atherton is the owner of said east half of the lot, and that he makes no claim to any other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Fox v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Chapman v. ZoberleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jacoby v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Green v. De Los PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- J. H. Silsby & Co. v. KinsleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- Ward v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Edwards v. City of Santa PaulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.