Legal Opinion
People v. Rodriguez
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided August 16, 2019No. E069339PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
*974FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On March 3, 2005, defendant and appellant Jorge A. Millan Rodriguez pled guilty to unlawful intercourse by a person over 21 under Penal Code 1 section 261.5, subdivision (d). Defendant, as a person over 21, admitted to having sex with a person under the age of 16. The trial court sentenced defendant to formal probation for 36 months.
*541*975On June 7, 2005, defendant was taken into custody by the Immigration and Naturalization Service pending resolution by an immigration judge whether defendant would be removed from the United States. That same year, defendant was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. VivarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- People v. Amirian CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Arissol CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Ayala CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Bohmwald CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.