Farmers Bank of Sunbury v. City of Elizabeth City
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The questions presented on this appeal are whether summary judgment for defendant was proper, and whether the court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment must be granted, upon motion, “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c). See also Oakley v. Little, 49 N.C. App. 646, 272 S.E. 2d 370 (1980).
The briefs of both…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Smith v. CurrieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Oakley v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Harrell v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lawyer v. City of Elizabeth CityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Patterson v. CITY OF GASTONIACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Al-Nasra v. Cleveland CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Woodard v. CLEVELAND COUNTYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010