Legal Opinion

Oakley v. Little

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1980No. 803SC247PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Appellant contends generally that the trial court erred by granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56, summary judgment shall be rendered if the trial court determines from a consideration of the pleadings, depositions, and affidavits that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Summary judgment allows quick and final disposition of claims where there is no real question as to whether plaintiff should recover, or where the defendant has established a complete defense.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Flying W Airways, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Dr. Werner Oswald v. Jane B. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. Arcuri v. WeissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Arcuri v. WeissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ala, Inc. v. Ccair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Holley Equipment Company, a Corporation v. Credit Alliance Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Wakefield v. CrawleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Howard Construction Co. v. Jeff-Cole Quarries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Neugent v. Beroth Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API