Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Sebastopol Berry Growers Ass'n
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 8, 1946No. Civ. No. 4945PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELSH, District Judge.
Plaintiff requested, and was granted, leave to file a memorandum of authorities in opposition to defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars. Due consideration thereof prompts the following modification of the opinion and order heretofore rendered and made herein with respect to said motion.
As was said in Bowles v. Schultz, D.C., 54 F.Supp. 708, 710: “The granting of a bill of particulars is a matter within the sound discretion of the court but in exercising its discretion the court should not overlook general principles. Conclusions of law cannot be substituted for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Bowles v. JacobsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
- Bowles v. SchultzDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1944
- Walling v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1942
- Westland Oil Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kuenzell v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
- Bowles v. SchlambergDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1946