Bowles v. Schlamberg
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
WELSH, District Judge.
Reference is made to opinions filed in Bowles v. Flotill, D.C., 4 F.R.D. 499, and Bowles v. Sebastopol Berry Growers Association, D.C., 5 F.R.D. 178, for the views of this Court in regard to bills of particulars.
It is ordered that defendants’ motion for a bill of particulars be, and the same is hereby, granted in the following respects—
That plaintiff be required to specify:
1. The specific articles of apparel referred to as “certain articles of apparel” in lines 16 and 17, page 2 of plaintiff’s complaint ;
2. (a) The specific articles of apparel which plaintiff alleges in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bowles v. Flotill Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1945
- Bowles v. Sebastopol Berry Growers Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1946
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bowles v. AlfordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1946
- Malone v. City of Akron, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024