Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Schultz

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided March 17, 1944No. Civ. No. 305PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

This action is brought by the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration under the provisions of Section 205(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix § 901 et seq., to recover treble damages for alleged violations of the Act.

The complaint alleges that from and including February 1, 1943, more than six months after the date of approval and enactment of the Act, to and including April 3, 1943, the defendants, dealers in processed beef, veal and pork, doing business in the City of Portsmouth, County of Rockingham, State of New Hampshire,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  2. Home Loan Bank Board v. Mallonee Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  3. Bowles v. OhseDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  4. Bowles v. Sebastopol Berry Growers Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1946
  5. Bowles v. SigelDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API