Legal Opinion
Smith v. Reynolds
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 3, 1999No. AC 17955PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The plaintiff, Gerald Smith, appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the motion filed by the defendant, Wanda Reynolds, to restore the case to the docket after the plaintiff withdrew his cause of *382action.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly restored the case to the docket because the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to the appeal. The plaintiff commenced the lawsuit, a derivative action,2 on July 9, 1997. The defendant filed a motion for an appraisal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Sicaras v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Solomon v. KeiserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Baker v. CordiscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Barra v. Ridgefield Card & Gift Gallery, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. TwineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Grimm v. GrimmConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Tyler E. Lyman, Inc. v. LodriniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- In Re Application of New York T., No. X06cv-02-0170932-S (May 8, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.