Legal Opinion

Grimm v. Grimm

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 31, 2002No. AC 22315PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The tortured histoiy of this case demonstrates the detrimental effect that procedural dysfunction in a marital dissolution action can have on the judicial process.1 The specific questions presented in this appeal are whether the court improperly (1) refused to vacate the plaintiffs withdrawal of the action and (2) declined to restore the case to the docket to permit the defendant to seek counsel fees. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Reasonable discussion of those issues requires a cursory review of the court’s voluminous file. This marital dissolution action was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sicaras v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Nielsen v. NielsenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Marshall v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Brown v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Smith v. ReynoldsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Melendez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Grimm v. GrimmConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. State v. WalczykConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Goodspeed Airport v. East Haddam, No. X07-Cv01 0076811s (Jan. 7, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
  5. Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API