Legal Opinion
State v. Continental Assur. Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
* Appeal dismissed, 311 U.S. 5, 85 L.Ed. ___, 61 S.Ct. 1. Statutes re-enacted by Code sections 6118, 6120, and 6122, in force when defendant qualified to do an insurance business in the State, provide:
Section 6118 —
"Each foreign insurance company doing business under the provisions of this article, shall, in January and July of each year, report, under oath of the president and secretary, or other chief officer of such company, to the commissioner, the total amount of gross premiums received in this state within the six months next preceding the first of January and July, or since the last…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. TafoyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Fourth & First Bank & Trust Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Continental Assurance Co. v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. Continental Assur. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leggett v. Missouri State Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Continental Assurance Co. v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Great Northern Life Ins. v. ReadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- People v. Alliance Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- American United Life Insurance v. FischerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.