State v. Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. ■ Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. Hon. Henry H. Cook, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtWilkes., J.
Prior to July, 1894, the Oonnecti-cut ‘.Mutual Life Insurance Oompany prosecuted its business of life insurance in the State of Tennessee through resident agents and local and general agencies. At that date it withdrew from the State, so far as soliciting or attempting to do any new business was concerned, leaving, however, quite a large number of policies in force.
Prom July, 1894, to July, 1899, it received from policy holders residing in Tennessee ■ premiums aggregating $137,884.47. Of this sum $134,326.96 was collected on policies originally solicited and taken in the State, and $2,857.50…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Young v. South Tredegar Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1886
- Dugger v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by12 opinions
- Continental Assurance Co. v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Kavanaugh v. Security Trust & Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- In re Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Thach v. Continental Travelers' Mutual Accident Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. RichardsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.