Legal Opinion

State v. Continental Assur. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Statutes re-enacted by Code sections 6118, 6120, and 6122, in force when defendant qualified to do an insurance business in the State, provide:

Section 6118—

“Each foreign insurance company doing business under the provisions of this article, shall, in January and July of each year, report, under oath of the president and secretary, or other chief officer of such company, to the commissioner, the total amount of gross premiums received in this state within the six months next preceding the first of January and July, or since the last return of such premiums were made by such company; and shall,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. TafoyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Fourth & First Bank & Trust Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Continental Assur. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API