Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Tafoya

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 22, 1926No. 88PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a bill in equity brought to. prevent the State Corporation Commission of New Mexico from suspending the right of the plaintiff to do business in that State. A final decree was entered by which it was declared that the defendants intend to suspend that right “ for the sole reason that the plaintiff has made payments to its agents in states other than New Mexico in connection with the procurement of business made, written and placed by the plaintiff in New Mexico”; that such payments are unlawful by virtue of § 2820 of the New Mexico Code of 1915, as amended by Chapter 195 of the Laws…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Badders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Frick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Raymondv v. Chicago Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API