Legal Opinion

Diamond Triumph Auto Glass, Inc. v. Safelite Glass Corp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 31, 2006No. 3:02cv514PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MUNLEY, District Judge.

Presently before the court for disposition is Defendant Safelite Glass Corporation’ motion for summary judgment. Additionally, Plaintiff Diamond Triumph Auto Glass, Inc. has moved for summary judgment on Safelite’ counterclaims. These matters have been fully briefed and are ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, we will grant each motion in part and deny each in part.

I. Background

Diamond and Safelite are competing glass companies. They each repair and replace damaged vehicle glass. A significant portion of the glass business involves providing…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. New Horizont, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Lindquist v. CITY OF PASADENA, TEX.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  3. Coalition for a Sustainable Delta v. JOHN McCAMMANDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Merisant Co. v. McNeil Nutritionals, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Crompton Greaves, Ltd. v. Shippers Stevedoring Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API