Legal Opinion

Lindquist v. CITY OF PASADENA, TEX.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided September 10, 2009No. Civil Action H-06-1975PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

James and Sandra Lindquist sued the City of Pasadena, Texas, challenging the City Council’s denial of their appeal from the City’s refusal of their application for a license to operate a used-car sales lot on property they owned. The City Council denied the appeal under a municipal ordinance requiring used-car lot operators to have a license. The ordinance required each newly licensed lot to be located a certain distance away from an existing licensed lot and from residential areas or subdivisions. The Lindquists alleged that the denial…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lindquist v. City of Pasadena TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. Medical Components, Inc. v. Osiris Medical, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2016
  3. Craig v. City of Yazoo CityDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2013
  4. ADT Holdings, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2017
  5. Clewiston Commons LLC v. City of ClewistonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API