Legal Opinion

People v. Wright

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1963No. Crim. 8544PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Appellant Wright and defendants Jackson and Malone were accused by information with kidnaping for the purpose of robbery (Pen. Code, § 209), robbery of one Bayliss (Pen. Code, § 211) and robbery of one Brody. A jury convicted Wright and Jackson of each offense charged; Malone was acquitted. As to Wright, the jury also found the robbery to be of the first degree and that he was armed as alleged in the information. All three accused were represented at the trial by separate counsel. The appeal is from the judgment and the order denying a new trial.

On November 16, 1961, the victim Brody was the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Greenstone v. Claretian Theological SeminaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. AshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. People v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API