Legal Opinion

People v. Griffin

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1967No. Crim. 12603PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaus, P. J.

Defendants Billy Calvin Griffin, Beatrice Nelson and Willie Bobinson, each were found guilty of a violation of section 11530 (possession of marijuana) of the Health and Safety Code. They appeal claiming:

1. That the search and seizure which led to the discovery of the narcotic was illegal; and

2. That the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions.

The matter was tried to the court on the following stipulation:

“Mr. Fukuto: At this time, then, your Honor, the People will offer to stipulate that the People’s case-in-chief may be submitted to the Court on the testimony taken at the time…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. MardianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. ScomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. GlaubmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  5. People v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API