Legal Opinion

People v. Gardner

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1967No. Crim. No. 5602PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment of conviction for two counts of armed robbery. We have concluded that there is no merit to his sole contention that certain evidence was inadmissible on the basis that it was obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure.

The pertinent factual background of the instant case is as follows: Michael O’Neal testified that on September 13, 1965 he was employed at the Begal Gas Station at Third and Thomas Streets in San Francisco; that at 11:40 p.m., while he *322was in the station office checking his receipts, a Negro man wearing a mustache and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. United States v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. People v. DurenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API