Legal Opinion

Paul v. Paul

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1980No. 10 and 53PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

The parties in this domestic relations case have filed cross-appeals. For the reasons stated below, we quash both appeals.

In the fall of 1974, Norina Paul filed three lawsuits in the lower court against her husband, Ted Paul-one in divorce, one in equity, 1 and one for support. 2 In connection with her divorce action, Norina also filed a petition for alimony pendente lite and counsel fees and expenses. From December 1974 until August 1976, however, none of Norina’s actions was prosecuted, as she and Ted had apparently reconciled their differences and were living together. In…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Drummond v. DrummondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Rutherford v. RutherfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Brady v. BradySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Lynn v. LynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Bickley v. BickleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Juniata Foods, Inc. v. Mifflin County Development AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nixon v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API