Brady v. Brady
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
Appellee instituted an action for divorce a mensa et thoro, alleging desertion and bigamy, and petitioned for alimony pendente lite and counsel fees. Appellant answered that appellee was not liis wife, that he had been divorced from her in Nevada, and had since married another woman. The court below declined to consider the merits of the divorce application, and granted the petition.
Allowance of alimony pendente lite and counsel fees is a final and appealable order. Gould v. Gould, 95 Pa. Superior Ct. 387. Appellate review is limited to examination of the exercise of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lynn v. LynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Gould v. GouldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Murray v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- C. E. Williams Co. v. Henry B. Pancoast Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- In Re the Marriage of WinegardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.