Legal Opinion

Brady v. Brady

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1951No. Appeal, 226PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Appellee instituted an action for divorce a mensa et thoro, alleging desertion and bigamy, and petitioned for alimony pendente lite and counsel fees. Appellant answered that appellee was not liis wife, that he had been divorced from her in Nevada, and had since married another woman. The court below declined to consider the merits of the divorce application, and granted the petition.

Allowance of alimony pendente lite and counsel fees is a final and appealable order. Gould v. Gould, 95 Pa. Superior Ct. 387. Appellate review is limited to examination of the exercise of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lynn v. LynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Gould v. GouldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Murray v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. C. E. Williams Co. v. Henry B. Pancoast Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. In Re the Marriage of WinegardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API