Legal Opinion
Metro MacHine Corp. v. United States Small Business Administration
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 26, 2004No. CIV.A.2:03 CV 838PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Metro Machine Corp. (“Metro Machine”), seeks a declaration that the decision of defendants, United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and Michael P. McHale, Associate Administrator of the HUBZone Program, to de-certify Metro Machine as a qualified HUBZone small business concern was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise contrary to law, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). For the reasons set forth below, Metro…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aeolus Systems, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Mission Critical Solutions v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Gordon College v. Small Business AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Metro MacHine Corp. v. Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004