Legal Opinion
Aeolus Systems, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 31, 2007No. 07-581CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
This pre-award bid protest is before the court on cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record filed under Rule 52.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). In this ease, plaintiff Aeolus Systems, LLC (Aeolus) challenges the United States Small Business Administration’s (SBA) determination that Aeolus was not a qualified Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) small business concern. The SBA’s decision led to the cancellation of a contract awarded to Aeolus by the United States Department of the Army (Army) in 2006, which the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Ceres Gulf, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- OSG Product Tankers LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Dorado Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.