Legal Opinion
Mission Critical Solutions v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 8, 2011No. 10-810 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*659 OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Judge:
In this action, Plaintiff Mission Critical Solutions (“MCS”) challenges its decertification by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) as a Historically Underutilized Business Zone (“HUBZone”) small business concern (“SBC”). The effect of its decertifi-cation is that Plaintiff cannot compete for government contracts which require HUBZone qualification as a condition for bidding and award, including in particular Department of the Air Force Solicitation FA8773-10-R-0053, which is a 100% set-aside for HUBZone small businesses. Plaintiff seeks judgment on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Contract Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Mission Critical Solutions v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Senter, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018