Legal Opinion

Pin-Ball MacHine v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1962No. 162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AREND, Justice.

This is a proceeding in rem in which the state is seeking the forfeiture of six pinball machines. The libel of information alleges that the machines were used to conduct gambling in violation of section 65 — 13— 18 A.C.L.A.1949 and that, under the provisions of section 4-2-1 A.C.L.A.1949, they are subject to seizure and forfeiture. 1

The trial was had with commendable dispatch and the parties very sensibly stipulated that the case would be tried as to only one of the machines because the evidence would have been substantially the same for all of the machines.

The only testimony…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Dussault v. KilburnMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. AyersOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. In Re WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Ah Poo v. StevensonOregon Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kristich v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. Pinball MacHinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. One Cocktail Glass v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. One Cocktail Glass v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. One Cocktail Glass v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API