Pin-Ball MacHine v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AREND, Justice.
This is a proceeding in rem in which the state is seeking the forfeiture of six pinball machines. The libel of information alleges that the machines were used to conduct gambling in violation of section 65 — 13— 18 A.C.L.A.1949 and that, under the provisions of section 4-2-1 A.C.L.A.1949, they are subject to seizure and forfeiture. 1
The trial was had with commendable dispatch and the parties very sensibly stipulated that the case would be tried as to only one of the machines because the evidence would have been substantially the same for all of the machines.
The only testimony…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Dussault v. KilburnMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. AyersOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Ah Poo v. StevensonOregon Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kristich v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. Pinball MacHinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
- One Cocktail Glass v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- One Cocktail Glass v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- One Cocktail Glass v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977