One Cocktail Glass v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1DissentErwin, Justice
I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which holds that the $1,303.95 found in Parent’s left, front pocket, the $140.00 found in his right, front pocket, and the $1,100.00 found in the wallet located on his person are not subject to seizure and destruction as gambling implements within the meaning of AS 11.45.040, which reads:
The commissioner of public safety, a member of the division of state police, or a police or peace officer designated by the commissioner shall seize and destroy a gambling implement.
I reach this result on the basis of the admission made by Parent at the time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dorrell v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- United States v. Three Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-Six DollarsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1958
- Pin-Ball MacHine v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1962