Legal Opinion

State v. Ayers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1907PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From Multnomah: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. William M. Ayers appeals from a judgment of conviction for pool selling.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

The defendant, William M. Ayers, was accused by an information of the crime of wilfully committing an act which grossly disturbed the public peace, openly outraged public decency,' and injured the public morals, alleged to have been perpetrated in Multnomah County, August 4, 1905, and''prior thereto, by habitually selling for gain pools upon horses at an exhibition trial of their speed on a race track, particularly describing the place and the method pursued, and that he there, and on the day mentioned, sold a ticket upon a certain horse to one Victor Lindbaek, receiving therefor the sum of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GodfreyOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  2. State v. NeaseOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Prindle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. Burk v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Portis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1872

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Utah State Fair Ass'n v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. City of Portland v. DuntleyOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State v. AnthonyOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Multnomah County Fair Ass'n v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API