Legal Opinion

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Bee Agricultural Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 3, 2000No. 13-99-174-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MELCHOR CHAVEZ, Justice.

This case concerns a retailer’s right to indemnity from the manufacturer of a product that becomes the subject of a products liability lawsuit. In this case the trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of the manufacturer on the products liability issue, and ordered the manufacturer to pay the retailer’s costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees incurred in defending the products liability case. The manufacturer appeals from the order to pay costs, expenses, and attorney’s fees. We affirm.

Du Pont manufactured a herbicide that it marketed under the brand name…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kalteyer v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Stevens v. City of DublinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Hurst v. American Racing Equipment, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  5. Freightliner Corp. v. Ruan Leasing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meritor Automotive, Inc. v. Ruan Leasing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. ASI Technologies, Inc. v. Johnson Equipment Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  3. ASI Technologies, Inc. v. Johnson Equipment Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  4. Latasha Freeman v. American K-9 Detection Services, L.L.C. and Hill Country Dog Center, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API