Legal Opinion
Hurst v. American Racing Equipment, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided October 16, 1998No. 06-97-00125-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSS, Justice.
James Hurst, individually and d/b/a Pe-gues-Hurst Ford, Pegues-Hurst Motor Company (Hurst), 1 appeals from an adverse summary judgment in his suit seeking indemnification from American Racing Equipment (ARE) and Larry Hayes, individually and d/b/a Longview Wheel and Performance (LWP).
Hurst contends that the trial court should not have granted summary judgment in favor of ARE and LWP because it is their duty to indemnify him for payments that he made to the plaintiffs in an earlier suit settling their claims against him based upon negligence and products liability.
Mark…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Board of Insurance Commissioners v. Great Southern Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Baubles & Beads v. Louis Vuitton, S.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Memorial Medical Center v. KeszlerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meritor Automotive, Inc. v. Ruan Leasing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Honeywell v. Gada Builders, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Freightliner Corp. v. Ruan Leasing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Bee Agricultural Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Dean's Campin' Co. v. Peter Hardsteen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.