Legal Opinion

Freightliner Corp. v. Ruan Leasing Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided November 18, 1999No. 03-99-00212-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.

Freightliner Corporation and Rockwell International Plastic Products (the manufacturers) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment requiring them to indemnify Ruan Leasing Company. Ruan asserted a claim against the manufacturers for indemnification arising out of its defense of a products liability action. The manufacturers dispute the district court’s construction of a manufacturer’s duty to indemnify under sections 82.001 and 82.002 of the Texas Products Liability Act. 1 We will affirm the summary judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

While en route…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Rourke v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Hurst v. American Racing Equipment, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Meritor Automotive, Inc. v. Ruan Leasing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Graco, Inc. v. CRC, Inc. of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  3. Seelin Medical, Inc. v. Invacare Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006
  4. Panatrol Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
  5. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Bee Agricultural Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API