Legal Opinion
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 27, 1993No. C9-91-2065, C9-91-2096PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
In these cases, we are asked to construe several insurance policies issued by petitioners to determine if they provide coverage for claims brought by purchasers of seed potatoes whose crops were contaminated with bacterial ring rot. 1 The trial court ruled that certain of the policies did not provide coverage. The court of appeals disagreed and reversed. 483 N.W.2d 495 (Minn.App.1992). We agree with the trial court’s ruling and reverse the court of appeals.
We also must address whether the Miller- Shugart 2 agreements entered into between Richard and David Paquin (“the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Cerberus International, Ltd. v. Apollo Management L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- American Family Insurance Co. v. WalserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.