Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. County of San Diego

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 18, 2006No. 04-55122PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants in this class action (“Appellants”), San Diego County welfax-e recipients, appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, County of San Diego and various county officials (collectively, “San Diego County” or the “County”). Appellants coxxtend that the district court erred in concluding that the County’s welfare eligibility program (“Project 100%”), which requires all welfare applicants to consent to a warrantless home visit as a condition of eligibility, does not violate them lights under the United States…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Simon v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  2. Kathleen Whalen v. John McMullenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Nelson v. City of DavisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Lopez v. YoungbloodDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  5. Lebron v. WilkinsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API